NEW You can now add a photo to your posts and replies — vials, pens, injection sites and progress pics are all welcome. Max 5 MB, and location data is stripped automatically.
Medications

Tirzepatide and muscle mass — what the research says

Started by NicoleLane · · 60 replies · 561 views
#41

honestly, has anyone actually posted a DEXA before and after in here? I keep seeing the same secondary endpoint papers cited and would rather look at scans from people mid-stack than argue over small percentages.

#44

I lift four days a week and my last scan showed lean mass basically unchanged, so my own numbers line up with the idea that the drug difference is small next to the training. The trial gap people cite seems like a footnote compared to whether you're actually resistance training.

#46

I did a DEXA at the start and one around month four, and honestly the lean mass number barely budged, which surprised me since I wasn't lifting much then. Curious whether you've seen anything head to head or is it all just reanalysis of the same trials

#47

I think the SURMOUNT-1 substudy is the closest thing to what you're after, though it still isn't head to head. I've only tracked strength numbers on my own, no scan, so take that with a grain of salt.

#48

I never got a baseline scan either, so I'm going off how my strength numbers hold up at 12.5mg. Curious whether anyone's actually seen a head-to-head trial rather than the pooled stuff.

#49

I did a DEXA at month four mostly out of paranoia and the lean mass number had barely budged, which surprised me since I was eating so little. My guess is the protein and the two gym days a week carried it, not the vial.

#51

The DEXA angle is what I keep coming back to. I have not paid for one myself yet, mostly because I lift four days a week and would not know how to read the number without overreacting to normal noise

#52

no DEXA for me either, I'm just going off how my lifts feel, and honestly they've held steady since I started. Curious whether anyone here has actually paid for a scan out of pocket and felt it was worth the money.

#53

I've been doing a DEXA scan every three months since starting, mostly because I wanted to know if I was losing muscle along with the fat. So far the lean mass line has barely budged, which surprised me given how little I was eating early on.

#54

I did a DEXA at the start and again a few months in, and the lean mass drop was smaller than I expected given how fast the weight came off. Still no head-to-head study out there that settles it though, so my own scan is the only comparison I actually trust

#55

I skipped the DEXA and just watched my lifts, which is crude but it caught me getting weaker on squats around month two and I added protein after that. Has anyone here actually paid for a second scan yet?

#58

Down 43 on tirzepatide and my DEXA at the one-year mark showed less lean loss than I expected, though I can't separate the drug from the fact I started lifting the same month. The appetite suppression hit protein hardest for me too, so I started front-loading it early in the day when I still had appetite. The muscle loss research is mostly secondary endpoints anyway, so I've stopped waiting for a clean paper and just track my lifts.

Showing 41–60 of 61 posts

Write your reply…

You'll be asked to create a free account to post — takes a few seconds, and your reply stays right here.
Ask the community

Create a free account

Takes a few seconds — you'll come right back here.

Already have an account? Log in instead.